The idea of a Detroit bailout has all the liberal economists I know (including myself) feeling and sounding like Republicans: Let the free market decide!
No, markets aren’t perfect. But the best way to deal with their failings is to hedge against and/or compensate for them, not attempt to prevent them via direct intervention. If the major American auto manufacturers have grossly mismanaged their companies over the past couple decades–and I include terrible foresight about consumer demand under “gross mismanagement”–then those companies deserve to fail. The US government does not know better than the market which firms have a promising future; it should not get (further) into the business of picking winners.
Here’s what it should do instead: Spend money. Increase and extend unemployment benefits to help workers who are laid off. Spend massively on education and job training programs to retrain Americans whose industries are in decline. Increase subsidies for student loans to make college more affordable. Create a national health care program so that access to medical care is not tied to jobs on the chopping block. Provide funding for research and development in areas we deem important–particularly, as Obama has already noted, green technology. (Enough with the ethanol subsidies–how does Uncle Sam know that’s the inevitable winner in an alternative fuel match-up? We should be supporting ANYTHING that reduces our dependence on fossil fuels, and letting the most cost-effective one win.)
Economists revere the power of markets. Sometimes we take that reverance too far (see: the current financial meltdown), but Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand has infinite widsom to offer that no individual, or Congressional panel, or Presidential commission can match. Markets are simply really, really good at figuring out what consumers want and how best to produce those things. What are markets not so good at? Making sure no individuals are hurt so badly by this creative destruction that they cannot brush themselves off and get back in the game. That’s where the government can–and should!–play a constructive role.